Gagan, No hard deadline, but maybe we should create one? I would like to say a couple of weeks?
Aaron On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Gagan Juneja <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Aaron, > That's a great idea! > Do we have decided on any deadline for 0.1.5 release? > > Regards, > Gagan > > On Sunday, March 17, 2013, Aaron McCurry wrote: > > > Thanks Tim, I think that we should create JIRA issues for these working > > toward a 0.1.5 release. I can do that or other want before I get to them > > that's cool. Also we should branch 0.1.4 to create 0.1.5. > > > > Also the new metrics will be easy to drop in, so I think that we should > add > > that as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > -Lucene 4.2 Upgrade > > > > This is the big feature, but I spent a lot of time a few weeks ago > > > > testing the resource management (InputIndex clones, Buffers, File GC, > > > etc) > > > > and geting it all working. So I feel really good about this code. > > > > > > > > -Automatic Slab configuration (Easy to integrate code) > > > > This is simple but makes things easier to configure > > > > > > > > -Super Query Parser (Easy to integrate code) > > > > This gives explicit control over the super queries > > > > > > > > There will probably be a couple of more things to add but most are > > going > > > to > > > > be drop in replacements of existing code. > > > > > > > > Anything else that you can think of that would be good backport? > > > > > > Looks good, unless the new metrics stuffs is solid enough? I could > > > take a stab at backporting the new auto slab configs if you want? > > > > > > --tim > > > > > >
