+1 signatures and checksums are good, licensing looks good and tests pass. Doug
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 sig/xsum are valid. RAT runs clean. I checked the LICENSE/NOTICE > files for the src/bin artifacts and they look proper to me. > > Patrick > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is the third release candidate for Apache Blur, version >> 0.2.0-incubating. >> >> It fixes the following issues: >> http://incubator.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/release-notes.html >> >> *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. >> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for >> convenience. >> >> Source and binary files: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/ >> >> The tag to be voted upon: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=tag;h=8c402a8ea04242f1c727b6157a836f9862f71c4c >> >> Blur's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/KEYS
