Yeah the extra files were my fault. When I was changing site to only be in the bin artifact I was developing in the same place where the branch was checked out. The "site" was checked in on the last branch and I think my local git was confused. Because doing a git status on the project produced clean results. And after I remove the docs/site I still got a clean status.
The .settings, .eclipse, etc was because of my development environment. Rookie mistake. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > meld lists the differences as two parts afaict: 1) src artifact > includes generate docs, 2) src artifact includes some ide related dot > files not in git > > didn't seem like a huge issue to me, although dropping the ide files > would be a good idea. > > Patrick > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> > wrote: > > -1, the source artifact doesn't match an artifact built directly from > > a clone of the tag - we've got some extra files lingering in there. > > > > --tim > > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is the third release candidate for Apache Blur, version > >> 0.2.0-incubating. > >> > >> It fixes the following issues: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/release-notes.html > >> > >> *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. > >> > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for > >> convenience. > >> > >> Source and binary files: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/ > >> > >> The tag to be voted upon: > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=tag;h=8c402a8ea04242f1c727b6157a836f9862f71c4c > >> > >> Blur's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/KEYS >
