+1 for me.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Doug Cutting <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1.  Downloaded source.  Sigs, sums & licensing look good.
>
> Doug
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Blur, version
> > 0.2.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/release-notes.html
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> > convenience.
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=tag;h=8c402a8ea04242f1c727b6157a836f9862f71c4c
> >
> > Blur's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/KEYS
>

Reply via email to