+1

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:33 AM, rahul challapalli
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for me
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for me.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Doug Cutting <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > +1.  Downloaded source.  Sigs, sums & licensing look good.
>> >
>> > Doug
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Blur, version
>> > > 0.2.0-incubating.
>> > >
>> > > It fixes the following issues:
>> > > http://incubator.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/release-notes.html
>> > >
>> > > *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
>> > >
>> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for
>> > > convenience.
>> > >
>> > > Source and binary files:
>> > >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/
>> > >
>> > > The tag to be voted upon:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=tag;h=8c402a8ea04242f1c727b6157a836f9862f71c4c
>> > >
>> > > Blur's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/KEYS
>> >
>>

Reply via email to