Then I would say go it. Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 26, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Chris Rohr <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be for running tests and possibly packaging (not sure if this is > needed). It would not be needed for runtime. > > On Saturday, October 26, 2013, Aaron McCurry wrote: > >> Is this to require Node to run the tests, what about when it's deployed? >> If it's just for the tests and it makes your life easier, then I would say >> yes go ahead. >> >> Aaron >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chris Rohr >> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >>> While working on the new Blur Console I have been trying to figure out >> ways >>> to run Javascript tests easily within our current setup and I had a >>> question for the group. Does anyone have a problem with requiring the >>> system to have another tool (i.e. Node) installed in order to run the >>> console tests? I really don't want to add more dependencies than we >> need, >>> but this would make it very easy to call out from maven to run the tests >>> using Node. >>> >>> Just wanted to get some thoughts >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris >>
