Well this is not the thread I meant to reply to. doh. I like bringing in node personally.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > In defense of using node. We do require that people install thrift, java, > maven and git to be able to perform all development tasks. Since there is > very little jvm javascript tools like Chris needs for developing a > javascript heavy web front end I can understand why node could be used for > development purposes. > > Aaron > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Chris Rohr <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It would be for running tests and possibly packaging (not sure if this > is > > > needed). It would not be needed for runtime. > > > > I dunno, it feels a heavy (separate install required) and random > > precondition to building/packaging Blur to me. I guess I really like > > that the quickstart now is simply 'git clone && mvn install'. What are > > the alternatives? > > > > Thanks, > > --tim > > >
