Yeah the current code base version is on 0.3.0. So we could just make the changes now is this version.
I would like to start moving forward with these issues as soon as possible. I will give it a day or so for anyone else to chime in but I think we can assume that the renaming issues should move forward. Aaron On Wednesday, November 11, 2015, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Since Blur was created it has been about big data. Large indexes, large > > clusters, large ingest rates, fast queries, etc. Over the years features > > have been created that add more database like properties. In concept > this > > was a good thing, but those decisions have made it difficult to > understand > > and for Blur to perform well under those database like constraints. > > > > I believe now is the time for the project to regain focus on what it does > > well. I have created some tickets that will begin the transformation > into > > a more focused project. > > This is great, thanks Aaron! For context, I assume these are for a > post-0.2.4? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-442 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-443 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-444 > > Wahoo! to all three! > > Will ask clarifying questions on the others in JIRA... > > --tim >
