What would you say is gating a 1.0? I realize it's just a number, but it does send a message.
Patrick On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Garrett Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > That makes sense, cut 0.3.0 and begin 0.4.0. Thumbs up here then! > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The current 0.3.0 is just 0.2.4 with only supporting Hadoop 2 and java 8. > > So perhaps we should release 0.3.0 and move to 0.4.0 with proposed > changes. > > > > Aaron > > > > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015, Garrett Barton < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > If the current code base is 0.3.0 was there a 0.2.4 release cut? I > would > > > very much like to see one release done with everything that is in blur > > > today just to have something newer than 0.2.3 to work with in the > > > meantime. Is that acceptable before kicking any of these much desired > > > efforts off? > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah the current code base version is on 0.3.0. So we could just make > > the > > > > changes now is this version. > > > > > > > > I would like to start moving forward with these issues as soon as > > > > possible. I will give it a day or so for anyone else to chime in > but I > > > > think we can assume that the renaming issues should move forward. > > > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015, Tim Williams <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > Since Blur was created it has been about big data. Large > indexes, > > > > large > > > > > > clusters, large ingest rates, fast queries, etc. Over the years > > > > features > > > > > > have been created that add more database like properties. In > > concept > > > > > this > > > > > > was a good thing, but those decisions have made it difficult to > > > > > understand > > > > > > and for Blur to perform well under those database like > constraints. > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe now is the time for the project to regain focus on what > > it > > > > does > > > > > > well. I have created some tickets that will begin the > > transformation > > > > > into > > > > > > a more focused project. > > > > > > > > > > This is great, thanks Aaron! For context, I assume these are for a > > > > > post-0.2.4? > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-442 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-443 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-444 > > > > > > > > > > Wahoo! to all three! > > > > > > > > > > Will ask clarifying questions on the others in JIRA... > > > > > > > > > > --tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
