BM_discussion
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion
[email protected]

Today's topics:

* The politics of "schooling" : Education shorn of values. - 1 messages, 1 
author
 
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/3992f46c24e2c7a1

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The politics of "schooling" : Education shorn of values.
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/3992f46c24e2c7a1
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Feb 25 2006 2:44 am 
From: Jagannath Chatterjee  

      Education shorn of values            
It's that time of the year when children leave the school system. By the Indian 
reality, most will never enter the portals of an educational institution again. 
JS Rajput feels for the new batch of rootless creatures released by the 
educational system    
There are occasions when one wonders why people the world over still admire 
India for its past contributions to the growth of civilisation and the 
evolution of thought. How could Indians achieve such spiritual insights that 
have eternal relevance on the time scale of history? This puzzle now has a 
contemporary context.
    
    The aura and influence of India in the ancient world was not confined to 
the shores of India alone. The invaders and the conquerors did retard the 
progress of India's search for knowledge and the quest for understanding what 
lies beyond this world. The systems of generating, disseminating and utilising 
information and knowledge were relegated to the background for obvious reasons.
    
    Yet, we managed to become the world's most illiterate nation. There can be 
no more comprehensive articulation of the distressing state of education in 
India than the famous words of Mahatma Gandhi, delivered at Chatham lines, 
London, on October 20, 1931: "I say without fear of my figures being challenged 
successfully, that today India is more illiterate than it was 50 years ago or a 
hundred years ago, and so is Burma, because the British administrators, when 
they came to India, instead of taking hold of the things as they were, began to 
root them out. They scratched the soil and began to look at the root, and left 
the root like that, and the beautiful tree perished."
    
    A couple of points that emerged in the scrutiny of the educational records, 
prepared and authenticated by the British officers between 1813 and 1830 
established that almost every village had a school. GL. Pendergast, a senior 
British officer, wrote about the Presidency of Bombay around 1920: "There is 
hardly a village great or small throughout our territories, in which there is 
not at least one school; in larger villages, more."
    
    Several such details have been unearthed from the records and indicate the 
existence of a widespread educational network extending to higher education in 
various disciplines. Supported entirely by charity and funding from the rulers 
of the area, these had more than 800 per cent students from what are classified 
as the lower strata of the society. Poverty or social status never debarred a 
young learner.
    
    The British began a process of dispossession, ensuring that the revenue 
sources to the educational institutions got dried up. The collector of Bellary, 
in his report on indigenous education wrote :"In many villages where formerly 
there were schools, there are now none." This indicates how the system was 
allowed to whither away. It's inner strength, combined with India's collective 
indomitable spirit, however, helped it maintain a semblance of continuity.
    
    Education and literacy relate to every aspect of human life. It applies to 
both the lettered and the unlettered. In the current context, there is hardly 
any need to reiterate the importance of education which is good in quality and 
acceptable in its content, apart from being envisioned as of relevance and 
utility by the individual and his larger society.
    
    It's natural for people everywhere to be concerned about education and the 
systems that administer and mange it in their locale. This valid concern 
extends to the content and process of education, which have to respond to the 
ever-changing needs and requirements of their society and, hence, have to 
change simultaneously. Education helps people to learn and know who they are. 
It acquaints people with their roots, traditions, culture and the systems of 
learning and knowing. It augments their relationship to their heritage, gives 
them a sense of achievement and opens new vistas before them.
    
    Every Indian is an inheritor of that powerful ancient heritage that 
attracts even the most modern-minded young person from every corner of the 
globe in search of peace, spirituality and in locating the real meaning of life 
and living.
    
    Growth and evolution of cultures rarely follow linear paths. By the end of 
the 20th century, it was clear to everyone that the colonial era had damaged 
the cultural and educational context of hundreds of nations who were materially 
exploited for centuries.
    
    They needed their own futuristic education systems in place of the 
transplanted models forced upon them by their alien rulers.
    
    UNESCO now accepts that education in every country must be "rooted to 
culture and committed progress". Unfortunately, in India, the very usage of 
terms like "Ancient Indian culture", "Civilisation", "Vedanta", "Sanskrit", 
etc., makes our Marxist intellectuals squirm. Character assasination, the most 
potent weapon in their armoury, is thrown in to action: the canard of 
"Saffronisation".
    
    In his Presidential address for the 1921 session of the Indian National 
Congress (sadly, it could not be delivered but was taken as read), Deshbandhu 
Chittaranjan Das wrote: "Who can contemplate with equanimity that every year 
many crores of rupees go out of India without corres-ponding advantage? 
Morally, we are becoming a nation of slaves, and have acquired most vices of 
the slaves, we speak the language of the master, and ape his manners, and we 
rush with alacrity to adopt his institutions, while our own lie languishing in 
the villages. Intellectually, we have become willing victims to the imposition 
of foreign culture on us; and the humiliation is complete when we are 
deliberately breaking away from the past, recognising no virtue in its 
continuity".
    
    Even after eight decades, this paragraph has relevance. It should be read 
and understood in word and spirit by those who have inherited the legacy of the 
great Indian National Congress of the pre-Independence era. It also must be 
realised that these people, now in power with Left support, are becoming 
willing partners in the designs of their supporters to cut off India's new 
generation from its glorious heritage and legacy.
    
    The leaders of the freedom struggle considered the issue of educational 
change in India with great anticipation and commitment. All of us are familiar 
with "Basic Education" (Buniyadi Talim) formulation of Gandhi, Zakir Hussain 
and others. Chakravarty Rajagopalachari expressed serous doubts on what would 
happen to India when the generation that was in schools in 1950 took over the 
reins.His concerns arose out of the fact that the young ones were being 
imparted only "materialistic values", and were totally cut off from their 
Indian roots. One could cite several reports, resolutions, documents and 
deliberations emphasising the need to link the Indian education system to the 
Indian value ethos.thought and intellect. But vested interests resisted it 
successfully and are still going strong after it.
    
    How does a vocal minority group of Indian intellectuals manage to garner so 
much publicity in its campaign against Indian culture and heritage? This can be 
understood if one recalls Kulpati Munshi's reflections on his college days in 
the early years of the 20th century. He recalled: "I was in the college and 
came under the influence of John Stuart Mill and Herbert Spencer. Like some of 
you, we thought ourselves 'progressives' only when we looked down on our 
ancient heritage, and looked up to whatever came from the West. Even our great 
epics, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, about which we knew quiet a lot from 
our childhood, came into disrepute with us. The Mission houses, through their 
little books, told us that those of us who drew sustenance from these epics 
were no better than savages!"
    
    KM Munshi was an exception. He raised a question to himself: "How was it 
that Indian culture had survived when so many ancient cultures in History had 
withered away? How was it that the vitality of Indian culture had continued 
through the ages despite historical vicissitudes?"
    
    Who cares about the Policy and the manner in which it is changed? Otherwise 
how can those who swear by the name of Rajiv Gandhi become a party to the 
violation of the National Policy of Education-1986 (NPE-86), which was one of 
his most progressive and visionary contributions? Half a page specifically 
devoted to value education in Rajiv's Education Policy vanished totally from 
the 2005 "prescriptions", which deliberately avoid focus on value-based 
education. NPE-1986 had emphasised the need for research in Indology, the 
search of the country's treasure of ancient knowledge and relating that 
knowledge to the modern reality. All this stands totally wiped out. 
    
    (The writer, a former Director of NCERT, is recipient of UNESCO's highest 
honour in the field of education, the Jan Comenius Medal for 2004

    "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the 
conquest of life by the power of the spirit." -  Aurobindo.




                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 



==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BM_discussion"
group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected] or visit 
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/subscribe

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com

Reply via email to