BM_discussion http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion?hl=en
[email protected] Today's topics: * Dispute over Dailt entry in temple (News) - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/6e7e87f0e96a9df1?hl=en * Pepsi Forced to Admit It's Bottling Tap Water - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/50918a03964d7788?hl=en * Caste, a matter in sports too - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/d45adda0d3b24bf4?hl=en * Results of the Elections to the National Executive - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/41455ed8f7580e55?hl=en * Fwd: Basic Structure Doctrine - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/cf951f04b2d3d663?hl=en * Surging Ahead! - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/f08faa82e6a26858?hl=en * Fwd: Food For Thought - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/3ba908a11224e875?hl=en * Bhumi August 2007 - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/e75adfb3f45657db?hl=en ============================================================================== TOPIC: Dispute over Dailt entry in temple (News) http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/6e7e87f0e96a9df1?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Aug 6 2007 1:04 am From: "Abhijit K" http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Dispute_over_Dailt_entry_in_temple/rssarticleshow/2256870.cms Dispute over Dailt entry in temple 5 Aug 2007, 1401 hrs IST,PTI SALEM (Tamil Nadu): The 400-year-old Sri Draupati Amman temple here has been closed after talks failed between Hindus and Dalits over the latter's entry into the shrine. The temple, maintained by Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) of the Tamil Nadu Government, was closed on Saturday "to maintain law and order and public tranqullity till the issue is solved", official sources said. The Dalits had announced that they would enter the temple on August six, which was strongly objected by Hindus. The district administration had held talks with the disputed parties on Saturday, but no solution was reached, the sources said. -- Abhijit Meenakshi About my name: www.geocities.com/abhijit1303/aboutname.txt www.bharatudaymission.org ============================================================================== TOPIC: Pepsi Forced to Admit It's Bottling Tap Water http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/50918a03964d7788?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Aug 6 2007 1:08 am From: "Abhijit K" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: nityanand jayaraman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Aug 6, 2007 6:53 AM Subject: {Youth for Social Ch Pepsi Forced to Admit It's Bottling Tap Water To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=13439§ionID=13 ZNet | Corporate Globalization Pepsi Forced to Admit It's Bottling Tap Water by Amy Goodman; Alternet; August 03, 2007 AMY GOODMAN: The soft drink giant Pepsi has been forced to make an embarrassing admission: Its bestselling Aquafina bottled water is nothing more than tap water. Last week, Pepsi agreed to change the labels of Aquafina to indicate the water comes from a public water source. Pepsi agreed to change its label under pressure from the advocacy group Corporate Accountability International, which has been leading an increasingly successful campaign against bottled water. In San Francisco, Mayor Gavin Newsom recently banned city departments from using city money to buy any kind of bottled water. In New York, local residents are being urged to drink tap water. The U.S. Conference of Mayors has passed a resolution that highlighted the importance of municipal water and called for more scrutiny of the impact of bottled water on city waste. The environmental impact of the country's obsession with bottled water has been staggering. Each day an estimated 60 million plastic water bottles are thrown away. Most are not recycled. The Pacific Institute has estimated 20 million barrels of oil are used each year to make the plastic for water bottles. Economically, it makes sense to stop buying bottled water as well. The Arizona Daily Star recently examined the cost difference between bottled water and water from the city's municipal supply. A half-liter of Pepsi's Aquafina at a Tucson convenience store costs $1.39. The bottle contains purified water from the Tucson water supply. From the tap, you can pour over 6.4 gallons for a penny. That makes the bottled stuff about 7,000 times more expensive, even though Aquafina is using the same water source. Gigi Kellett of Corporate Accountability International joins us in Boston, the group spearheading the Think Outside the Bottle campaign. We're also joined by freelance writer Michael Blanding. Last year he wrote an article for Alternet.org called "The Bottled Water Lie." We welcome you both to Democracy Now! I want to begin with Gigi Kellett. Talk about Pepsi's admission. GIGI KELLETT: Well, after a couple of years of our Think Outside the Bottle campaign, we have been asking of the bottled water corporations to come clean about where they get their water, what is the source of the water that they're bottling, because most people don't know that Pepsi's Aquafina, Coke's Dasani, come from our public water systems. And so, after thousands of phone calls, thousands of public comments submitted to the corporation, and us taking these demands directly to the corporation's annual shareholder meeting this year, Pepsi last week made the announcement that it would reveal that it gets its water from our public water systems. AMY GOODMAN: Now, where exactly does Pepsi get it? Which public water supply? GIGI KELLETT: Well, that is the issue that we're really looking at next, is what cities are they bottling the water in. You know, here in Massachusetts, it's coming from Ayre, Mass. So we want to make sure that on those bottles it says: "Public water source: Ayre, Massachusetts." That way, people know exactly what they're getting when they're buying that Aquafina bottled water. AMY GOODMAN: Ayre being the name of a town in Massachusetts. GIGI KELLETT: Ayre is the name of a town, right. Exactly. AMY GOODMAN: And what happens to the town? They have their public water supply, and they have the plant for Pepsi? GIGI KELLETT: That's right. We want to make sure that -- you know, Pepsi has certainly taken a lead on this for the bottled water industry, and we want to make sure that Coke and Nestle also follow suit. One of the things that we're finding as we're talking to people about this issue on the street is that they don't know where the water is coming from. And the bottled water corporations have spent tens of millions of dollars on ads that make people think that bottled water is somehow better, cleaner, safer than our public water systems. And in reality, we know that that's not true. And so, we want to make sure that we're increasing our people's confidence in their public water systems once again and knowing that we need to be investing in our public systems. AMY GOODMAN: Gigi, can you go further on who owns what? You mention Nestle. What does Nestle own? GIGI KELLETT: Nestle owns several dozen brands of bottled water. The bottled water brand they source from our public water systems is called Nestle Pure Life. They also own Poland Spring, Ozarka, Arrowhead. The list goes on. And regionally, it's distributed across the country. And then we also have Coca-Cola, which bottles Dasani water, and, of course, Pepsi with Aquafina. AMY GOODMAN: And when it comes to being tap water, what is the difference between plain tap water and distilled water from these public sources. GIGI KELLETT: Well, there's very little difference. You know, our public water systems go through a very rigorous testing and monitoring system and is tested by the Environmental Protection Agency. So we want to make sure that people know that our public water systems are much better regulated than these bottled water brands, which don't have to go through the same rigorous type of process. AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to Gigi Kellett, associate campaigns director of Corporate Accountability International. Michael Blanding, a freelance writer, has written the piece "The Bottled Water Lie." Michael, what is the lie? MICHAEL BLANDING: Well, there are actually several lies, I think, that the bottled water companies perpetrate, but I think the main one is exactly what Gigi said, that this image bolstered by, you know, millions and millions of dollars of advertising that bottled water is somehow better for you, it tastes better, it's more pure. And in many cases, that's simply not true. People are paying enormous premiums for bottled water and don't even realize the fact that in many cases not only does tap water taste the same, but that it's actually more tightly regulated and actually healthier for you. There have been, you know, several cases of bottled water that's actually been contaminated and found to contain hazardous chemicals. And tap water, there's actually a rigorous testing and monitoring of the water supply that actually in many cases makes it healthier. AMY GOODMAN: When we come back from break, I want to talk about some of those cases of contamination, but also talk about the community struggles that are working to take back their water supply. Our guests are Michael Blanding, who wrote "The Bottled Water Lie," and Gigi Kellett of Corporate Accountability International. Stay with us. [break] AMY GOODMAN: Now, Michael, you begin your piece by talking about Antonia Mahoney. Talk about who she is. MICHAEL BLANDING: She was someone who was just walking down the street in downtown Boston when the folks at Corporate Accountability -- Gigi and the folks in her group -- were holding something called the Tap Water Challenge, which was a taste test between tap water and various bottled water brands, Aquafina and Dasani. And I stood there during the afternoon and watched many people come up who were bottled water drinkers and could swear that they could tell the difference and that they could recognize their brand. And Antonia Mahoney was one of those who -- she actually had given off drinking tap water a few years ago and was drinking only Poland Spring and knew that she would be able to tell Poland Spring from all the other types of water that she was drinking there. And it turned out that what she thought was Poland Spring was actually the tap water from Boston, the good old tap water, which -- we actually have very good tap water that comes from western Mass here. So she was very surprised and shocked, and decided right there that she was going to leave off her contract of paying $30 a month for Poland Spring water, which she got delivered to her house. So it was very -- and there were other experiences like that during the day that I witnessed. AMY GOODMAN: Michael, you write about the problems of a suspected carcinogen chemical, bromate. You talk about the contamination of Dasani water, owned by Coca-Cola, in 2004. Explain what the problems are, the contamination issues. MICHAEL BLANDING: So, ironically, one of the processes that actually takes the tap water and purifies it -- it's called ozonation -- can actually in some cases have a byproduct, which is bromate, which is, as you say, a suspected carcinogen. And the largest case of contamination was in the U.K. in 2004, right when Dasani launched in the United Kingdom. They had something like a half-million bottles of Dasani water actually found to be contaminated, and people were getting sick. And it's just indicative of the lack of controls and the lack of monitoring that you find with bottled water. And it's not an isolated case. There have been many others that have occurred. Most recently up in Upstate New York, with an independent bottled water company, there were multiple cases of bromate contamination, as well. AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about the issue of filtering? First of all, I don't know if people realize when something says "public water source" that it means tap water. But then, what it means for that tap water to be filtered -- you talk about additional techniques like reverse-osmosis. MICHAEL BLANDING: Right, yeah. So there are various techniques that the companies use, and they tout them as these proprietary techniques that they go through seven different phases of filtering, and all the rest of it. And when you look at it, though -- reverse osmosis is the main one, which is basically just pushing water through a membrane to remove contaminants, and it's actually very similar to the type of process that can be found in home water filters, just the kind that you attach to your tap for a couple of hundred bucks. So -- it's not as sophisticated as they might pretend that it is. AMY GOODMAN: And internationally, the movements, from Bolivia to Peru, La Paz, all over. MICHAEL BLANDING: Yeah. What's interesting is that, here in the United States, there are several communities that have actually had plants take a lot of water from their groundwater up in Michigan where they can actually see the water level of one of their streams declining because of the massive amount that Nestle was taking from their water. And it's even a more critical issue in other countries where water scarcity is a real problem, so places like India, where Coca-Cola and Pepsi have actually really depleted communities, and farmers have been unable to grow their crops, it's kind of been a double whammy. They've taken the water, and then the water that they -- the waste water they've dumped back has been polluted, in many cases. And so, that's one issue, is just the depletion of water from the plants themselves. And then the other issue, which I know Gigi could talk about, is just the perception that comes across that somehow tap water is -- municipal water is somehow not as good as water that's been privatized. And so, you have -- it sort of starts this steady creep of where privatization of water sources becomes OK. And there have been many communities, like in Bolivia, where water supplies have been privatized and have been sold back to -- water that was previously free has, you know, skyrocketed in price. And people have taken to the streets and protested and actually got the private companies to leave. AMY GOODMAN: Gigi Kellett, let's talk about the tainting of the image of the municipal water supply in this country, the effect of the bottled water advertising industry campaigns. GIGI KELLETT: Well, this is something that's of real concern to our organization and our members and activists across the country, because we are seeing this -- who are we turning to to provide our drinking water? And there are -- these bottled water corporations are spending tens of millions of dollars every year on ads that effectively undermine people's confidence in their water. There was actually a poll done by the University of Arkansas earlier this year that found young people tend to choose bottled water over tap water, because they feel it's somehow cleaner or better than their public water systems. And as we've already mentioned here, we know that in reality that's not true. So there is a real concern about the impact that these bottled water corporations are having on the way we think about water. And our Think Outside the Bottle campaign is aiming to change that, and we're having real success with cities like San Francisco and Ann Arbor, Mich., and New York City, taking a lead on putting their public water systems back in the forefront and not contracting with bottled water corporations, for example, like in Salt Lake City and in San Francisco. And we're seeing restaurants turn to the tap in lieu of bottled water. So there's a lot that people are starting to look at in terms of this industry and what changes we can make to promote our own public water systems here in this country and make sure that they have the funding they need to thrive, and that also we're looking internationally to make sure that countries that may be cash-strapped also have the resources they need to have good, strong public water systems and not turn to privatization. AMY GOODMAN: Gigi, tell us about what happened in Salt Lake City and in San Francisco, with the mayor announcing that city money cannot be used to buy bottled water. GIGI KELLETT: That's right. You know, the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, after we had been working with his staff there, working with the San Francisco Department of the Environment and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, they looked at how much money they were spending on bottled water every year. It was close to a half-million dollars. And they said, "We're the forefront. We're cities. We're the forefront of ensuring that people have access to good, safe, clean water. And we're also now at the forefront of dealing with the waste that results from the bottled water industry. So we need to take a stand as a city." And in June, Mayor Newsom issued an executive order saying that the city would no longer be buying bottled water. And he joined with the mayor of Salt Lake City, Rocky Anderson, and also the mayor of Minneapolis, R.T. Rybak, to put forward a resolution at the U.S. Conference of Mayors calling on a study to really look at what are the impacts of bottled water on our municipal waste. So it's a real great leadership that we're seeing of these cities. AMY GOODMAN: And, Gigi, what about the effect that the water in the plastic bottle has? Is there any kind of leeching out? People think that they're getting healthier water in all sorts of ways, but what about the impact of that plastic? GIGI KELLETT: Well, there are a number of concerns about the impact of the plastic, yes, of course, in the leeching. These bottles that are made are single-serve bottles, so they're not intended to be reused, because of the potential for leeching of the plastic into -- when you're drinking the water. And then, of course, there are the environmental impacts of the bottles that are ending up in our landfills and on the side of the road as litter. They're not being recycled. Only about 23 percent of these plastic bottles are being recycled. So it's a huge impact for our environment and, of course, for people's health. So we want people to be looking at turning back to the tap and thinking outside the bottle. Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now! __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (1 ) Reply (via web post) | ... [Message clipped] Waste Not Asia [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Abhijit Meenakshi About my name: www.geocities.com/abhijit1303/aboutname.txt www.bharatudaymission.org ============================================================================== TOPIC: Caste, a matter in sports too http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/d45adda0d3b24bf4?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Aug 6 2007 2:30 am From: "Abhijit K" http://www.deccan.com/City/CityNews.asp#Caste,%20a%20matter%20in%20sports%20too Caste, a matter in sports too Hyderabad, July 27: Sports organisations, associations and sportspersons are angry over the State government's attempt to include sports quota under the caste reservation's purview in the Eamcet medical counselling. Protestors have threatened to move the High Court if the government implements sports quota under various caste quotas terming it "Horizontal reservations." They fear the government's decision will upset sportspersons and have a negative impact on their performance in the national and international competitions. "Sports quota is to encourage students to take up sports. Government says it is committed to encourage sports but on other hand it is corrupting it through backdoor methods," said an official of AP Physical Teachers Association. -- Abhijit Meenakshi About my name: www.geocities.com/abhijit1303/aboutname.txt www.bharatudaymission.org ============================================================================== TOPIC: Results of the Elections to the National Executive http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/41455ed8f7580e55?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Jul 30 2007 9:42 pm From: "Bharat Uday Mission - National Executive" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dr.Prahalathan KK, BM Chennai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jul 31, 2007 3:59 AM Subject: [BM_NationalCouncil] Results of the Elections to the National Executive To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Patriots, The National Council has voted decisively electing candidates to each of the responsibility with more than 50% votes. The three members shall join the National Executive with immediate effect and shall remain so till the end of the term of the current National Executive i.e. 31st March 2008. *The Elected Members are* *General Secretary:** Santosh Nargund, Bangalore* *Joint Secretary Information:** Gaurav Bharat, Ujjain* *Joint Secretary Propagation:** Arvind S, Gwalior* *Existing Members of National Executive* Joint Secretary Activities: Aditya G, Nasik Treasurer: Gyan, New Delhi. Vande Mataram! Prahalathan http://www.prahalathan.blogspot.com/ www.BhumiChennai.co.nr <http://www.bhumichennai.co.nr/> India at 59, Better than yesterday, But, not as good as tomorrow! www.bharatudaymission.org ============================================================================== TOPIC: Fwd: Basic Structure Doctrine http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/cf951f04b2d3d663?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Jul 30 2007 10:36 pm From: "Sundeep Jalan" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sundeep Jalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jul 31, 2007 10:57 AM Subject: Basic Structure Doctrine To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, There are some Iron Pillars on which the Constitution is founded. They are considered as indispencible. They cannot be replaced and their design cannot be changed. It is sigh of relief that the Hon. SC has time and again upheld that these Basic Pillars cannot be amended by Parliament. Similarly there are some most basic tenets of LIFE and they are *FOOD SHELTER* *CLOTHING*. No Life and Dignity of Life can ever be imagined in the absence of these FOOD SHELTER CLOTHING. *They are the Basic structure on which all LIVES are founded.* We the People of this country are a Family and though it is a Philosophy but has also trappings of a fact. In a Family set up, There is a Husband, a Wife and Childrens. Husband earns and gives money to wife for the administration of Household needs. The Mother spends the money without making any discrimination among their Childrens. All the way, they ensure that their childrens' most basic needs for their very survival must first be ensured with the money they have. It cannot be assumed that a Mother who has two children, spend money on comforts and luxuries on one and doesnt provide for the necessaries of the other. Right to FOOD SHELTER CLOTHINGs are SO Fundamental. These are the Foundations upon which any Fundamental right can dwell*.* Is it really possible to enjoy *"any"* rights whether Constitutional or otherwise in the absence of these rights. In the pretext of paucity of funds, the "State" have always abdicated from their Constitutional Obligations and veiled their inefficiency, misdeeds and Corruption. *In the light of the Doctrine of Basic Structure, the most basic needs of the People must be ensured and the defence of paucity of funds cannot be accepted having regard to the magnitude of Corruption in the State machinary.* ** *Sandeep Bharat.* ** ** *.* ------------------------------ DELETE button is history. Unlimited mail storage is just a click away.<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_6/*https://edit.india.yahoo.com/config/eval_register> ============================================================================== TOPIC: Surging Ahead! http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/f08faa82e6a26858?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Wed, Aug 1 2007 9:55 am From: "Bharat Uday Mission - National Executive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dear Members of the Mission, Thank you all for the trusting & showing confidence in my leadership. While I assume the most critical job in the mission, I would like to mention a few important points that are crucial to the success of the Mission both in rear & long terms. 1. Focus on your job/task in the mission & nothing else. 2. Give as much time to the mission as possible; 3. Shed laziness 4. Stop making excuses & being lenient on your body & mind. No great thing can be achieved without great sacrifices. 5. Neither yourself be the divisive force nor encourage or be part of any such tendencies. Because division is no solution. Unity is! 6. Most of us are doing a lot for the mission but let everyone of us ask and answer himself / herself very honestly the following questions: A. Have I given & am I giving my best to the mission? B. Am I being selfish at any point, be it in allocating time or any other thing for the mission activities? C. Am I in the mission to for my nation or to squabble with my fellow workers in the mission? D. Have I made any sacrifice for the mission when it needed one from me? E. How fast and with how much commitment am I moving towards total involvement in the mission? F. Have I kept the Big Promise of Service to the Nation, that I made while joining the mission? 7. If we're not able to put our house in order, to spread our word to the people, to take up activities, to discuss serious matters & find solution... and the like, let's not make flimsy excuses that we as individuals and as a group don't have time, money or the like. Because all that is rubbish. All this is because of our sheer laziness, inefficiency and impotency. I hope all of us will realise all of the above things, ponder seriously over them and ACT. We need to immediately and in the long term attend to the following things. è *Activities, activities & more activities, among the people * è *Propagate, Spread & Develop Strong Roots in the Society * è *Build a Strong Organisation & Set Good Precedents* è *Discuss matters / issues that require solution -- How we control the Population, How we provide Food, Shelter & Education to all our countrymen, How we build a Just & Honest Society, How, How, How...? * If every one of us begins doing these things honestly, then we will be doing nothing but building a great mass movement and we will usher in a prosperous India. I am initiating discussions within NE, NC and among all Active Members and like-minded people towards this end. Together we'll all struggle and achieve what we ahve set for ourselves. "Men can do all things if they will" *-- a quote from a writer of the Renaissance in Europe.* Reach me at 9916135836 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Santosh P. Nargund General Secretary, Bharat Uday Mission www.bharatudaymission.org 09916135836 ============================================================================== TOPIC: Fwd: Food For Thought http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/3ba908a11224e875?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Sun, Aug 5 2007 1:23 pm From: "Sundeep Jalan" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sundeep Jalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Aug 6, 2007 1:51 AM Subject: Food For Thought To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Escheat- The lapsing of property to the sovereign or state on the death of the owner, intestate and without legal heir.[S.29 Hindu Succession Act 1956.] If State is entitled to the property of a person say a deserted old age man/woman, then it becomes the responsibility of the State to maintain that old man/woman. By this definition, not only constitutionally but also statutorily it is the responsibility of the State to maintain every 'single' person living a life of destitution and deprivation, particularly the old age. Sandeep Bharat. ------------------------------ DELETE button is history. Unlimited mail storage is just a click away.<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_6/*https://edit.india.yahoo.com/config/eval_register> ============================================================================== TOPIC: Bhumi August 2007 http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/browse_thread/thread/e75adfb3f45657db?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Aug 6 2007 8:21 am From: "Bharat Uday Mission - National Executive" Dear Members, The August Edition of our magazine " Bhumi" is released. You can download it from our website at Magazine section or just by clicking the following link: http://www.bharatudaymission.org/site/images/magazine/bhumi_aug07.pdf<http://www.bharatudaymission.org/site/images/magazine/bhumi_aug07> -- Jai Hind! Santosh P. Nargund, Editor, Bhumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cell)+91-9916135836, (Res) +91-080-41556228 www.bharatudaymission.org -- "We have only one Passion, The Rise of a Great Nation." www.bharatudaymission.org -- "We have only one Passion, The Rise of a Great Nation." www.bharatudaymission.org ============================================================================== You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BM_discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] or visit http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change the way you get mail from this group, visit: http://groups.google.com/group/BM_discussion/subscribe?hl=en To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ============================================================================== Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en
