[uucdigest]         Monday, January 13 2003         Volume 03 : Number 6015



_________________________________________________________________
|
|  Search the ARCHIVES:
|     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
|
|  Visit Richard Nott's Ultimate BMW Database:
|     http://www.bmwdatabase.com
|
| For all available Digest commands including unsubscribe/subscribe,
| visit the BMW UUC Digest page: http://www.uucdigest.com
|
| Send SUBMISSIONS to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Complaints?  Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you must.
| Technical Problems? Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__________________________________________________________________

In this BMW UUC Digest:

       RE: [uuc] radar detector recommendations
       Re: [uuc] radar detector recommendations
       Re: [uuc] Apples vs. Oranges
       [uuc] Electrical Cut off switch
       [uuc] Re: Aluminum trailers
       [uuc] RE: Aluminum Trailer
       [uuc] Re: radar detector recommendations
       Re: [uuc] Question on M3 clutch
       RE: [uuc] radar detector recommendations
       Re: [uuc] Insurance, again
       [uuc] radar detector mounting brackets

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:58:28 -0500
From: "Andrew-Taylor Autosport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] radar detector recommendations

Wacky fighter pilots.

;)

- -A

>
> It would have to be significantly better than the current V1.
> i.e. - maybe
> incorporate a digital link to the next unit in the surrounding
> area to open
> up its detection range.  i.e. if my SC-1 were in communication range of
> another SC-1 it would interface with that SC-1 and surrounding SC-1s, ping
> the GPS system, interface with my onboard moving map display and pinpoint
> the radiating unit.  If I were using cruise control it would kick
> me out of
> cruise and reset my speed to the limit.
>
> For a further fee I could buy the SC-1mark2 would could launch a missile
> carrying an EMP device that would fry only the transmitting radar unit.
>
> And as long as it was the same size as the current one and didn't
> require me
> to put a bigger alternator on the car I'd pay you 2x the current price ;-)
>
> btw my current commuter vehicle is a pick-em up truck so the missile
> launcher could be in the bed.
>
> Marco
> I get co-credits on the patent
>

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:16:08 -0600
From: Sean Cordone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] radar detector recommendations

Excellent ideas. The game is so much more fun when you bring in active 
countermeasures.

Your royalty check/subpoena is in the mail. --SC

Marco Romani wrote:

>btw my current commuter vehicle is a pick-em up truck so the missile
>launcher could be in the bed.
>
>Marco
>I get co-credits on the patent
>  
>

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:35:08 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [uuc] Apples vs. Oranges

Clarence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ideally I would like to purchase a '91-'94 525i for the wife but
> have also noticed that a number of '88-91 735is are listing on 
> e-bay for about the same price (trying to stay in the $4-6,000
> range). 
>
> The car's use will be both short trips in our Dorf as well as 
> several 50 minute commutes to the big city each week. Kinda like 
> an auto but stick is fine if it works like it should.  I know 
> they're very different cars, but other than size and fuel economy
> are the 2 somewhat comparable?. Would a 7er be more maintenance?


Clarence,
If you have _a_ price range, a 7 is not for you. Full stop.
There is a reason why 7's are so cheap. It is the unlimited potential of 
the maintenance bills. 
A friend once said that there is hardly anything that goes wrong on a 7 
that can be repaired in under four figures. He was not joking.

alex f

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:51:10 -0800
From: "Marco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Electrical Cut off switch

In my never ending quest to constantly modify the race car I'd like to
install an electrical cutoff switch.  Anyone been there done that in an E36
M3?  It would be perfect if I could just use the same 4 wires leading to the
"jump start" block in the engine compartment passenger side, but that would
be way too easy.

thanks

Marco

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:42:33 -0500
From: "Kathy Lyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Re: Aluminum trailers

My Trailex weighs <850 lbs with tire rack.  Well made, tows great, not cheap.
www.trailex.com

Kathy

> <P>Group,
> <P>I'm considering buying an open car trailer, and I'm wondering if anyone
has any insights as to what the better brands are.&nbsp; Featherlite appears
to have a nice one, but contrary to their name, it is about 400 lbs heavier
than a comparable Aluminum Trailer Company unit.&nbsp; Our tow vehicle is
limited to about 5,200 lbs, so I want to keep the trailer weight fairly low
(hence no enclosed trailer - @#*%).&nbsp; What other quality mfr's are there?
> <P>I'd greatly appreciate any experiences you could share.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:21:32 -0500
From: "Gardner, Russell - BALTO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] RE: Aluminum Trailer

Neil D. asks about open car trailers.  Since I have recently completed a
several-month search for such a trailer, I thought it might be helpful if I
summarized my conclusions.

First, begin with an analysis of your proposed tow vehicle.  Determine the
towing or load capacity of the tow vehicle, remembering to add stuff that
will be in the tow vehicle, including you.  Then calculate the weight of the
vehicle you plan to tow plus all the stuff you plan to pile on the trailer.
The difference in that number will determine whether you can use a less
expensive steel trailer or whether you need a more expensive but lighter
aluminum trailer.  

Let me illustrate.  If your tow vehicle max is 5000 lbs. and you are looking
to track an M3, the added 1800 lbs. of a steel trailer will not let you add
the extra wheels, tires and equipment necessary for a track event.  The
@3200 lbs. of the M3 and the @1800 lbs. of the trailer will leave you with
@000 lbs. for extras.  The aluminum trailer, at a weight of 800 lbs., gives
ample margin for baggage.  The ONLY downside is that the total cost of an
aluminum trailer will run, with options, $7-8K.  Steel is much less.  Note
that I do not guarantee these numbers; the trailer you consider may weigh
more or less than my estimate.  

I found a Trailex (aluminum), <www.trailex.com>, in good shape.  It has some
very nice options, including a winch and a stone guard.  I don't need a tire
rack since the tow vehicle is a pickup.  It is 20 ft overall, weighs about
800 lbs.  

Russ Gardner
'95 M3
'93 Porsche RSA
'88 Chevy C/K 1500



____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication
to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information please visit us at http://www.piperrudnick.com
____________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:23:38 -0500
From: Phil Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Re: radar detector recommendations

Grant Low wrote:
>Is there a detector at $200 or less that
>is the "next best thing"?  It must have X, Ka, laser, and front/rear
>capabilities.  Once I get settled (physically and financially), I'll
>probably sell it on eBay and go for the V1.
>
>OTOH, perhaps I could borrow a lonely V1 (for a modest fee) for a few
>weeks?

We'll there's always that Valentine 30-day money-back guarantee! Not 
that you'd want to ever give it up once you've traveled 2000 miles 
with the locator feature. (And I wouldn't worry too much about laser 
detection, especially the ludicrous "rear laser" detector feature

Simple economics: V1s of nearly any age or configuration bring waaay 
too much money on ebay. Certainly most folks find it cheaper to sell 
their old ones on the Bay and buy a new V1 as opposed to the 
Valentine upgrade program. Most other detectors show normal 
depreciation for something that just ain't so unique. Meaning if you 
buy a lesser detector with the intention of selling it on eBay, just 
buy the V1 and sell it on eBay, if you still feel like it. You'll 
probably lose less dough that way.

- -Phil
  (had 'em all:  V1, Escort, Passport, K40, JR, Super Snooper, Whistler....)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:34:14 -0500
From: Dave Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] Question on M3 clutch

Ray asked:
>...what is the net wisdom on lightened flywheels for the E36 M3?

See Richard Nott's BMW database for some list wisdom:
http://member.rivernet.com.au/btaylor/

UUC Motorwerks has a couple recent lightweight flywheels available:
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/

If you do this, please post results back to the list!

Dave Meyer
99 328is
03 FLHRI
Stafford VA

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:38:17 -0500
From: "Dennis Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] radar detector recommendations

Sean wrote:

>Just as a hypothetical: If someone offered something that significantly
improved on the V1's performance (for a price of course) would you buy
it? How much would you be willing to spend for radar detection? How big
a device would you tolerate?  Everyone claims the V1 is the best - if
something was "better" would you buy it, or has the V1 reached the "good
enough" level for most uuc'ers?
_______________

Ah, now we're moving beyond the world of electronics and engineering to
finance and cost-benefit and risk-harm analyses.

Put it this way, Sean.  What's the cost of preventing a speeding ticket?
Assume that the "new and improved" Valentine, call it the V2, prevents one
additional ticket per year.  For ***ME***, living in a state where insurance
is expensive, with multiple vehicles, and insurance surcharges that last for
7 years, that can add up to over five hundred bucks PER YEAR.  Doing the
math, I'd be the first person on the list for the V2, even if it costs, say,
$1000.

Of course, the central conceit of my argument is that the V2 would save me
from that marginal one extra ticket per year; I have no assurance that it
will.  But since the harm to me is so great, a few hundred extra bucks is
well worth my peace of mind.

BTW, here's my prediction -- Mike Valentine is sitting in his basement,
rigging up the V2 to run with GPS and a port to link to your PC.  This will
allow the unit to download and/or store "known" false alarms, such as
supermarkets/hospitals.  And it wouldn't increase your risk profile, as the
bogey counter would still alert you to cops parked in range of known false
alarms.  You'd need to connect it to a PC to be able to download "maps" of
known false alarms for new areas, AND you could also download new Photo
radar sites too (they already offer this in Britain, I think).

My $.02.

vty,

- --Dennis

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:42:15 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [uuc] Insurance, again

Carl,

Since at a driving school you're not being timed, nor are results reflecting 
relative position to other cars being collected, nor is the school organised 
as a direct precursor to a racing or other timed event, it's hard to see how 
you could be construed to be competing in, practicing, or preparing for any 
prearranged or organized racing or speed contest.

Until the wording changes, I can't see how you'd be denied coverage for a 
claim on this basis (but that's just my semi-logical opinion).  Let's hope 
you don't find out.

Martin Bullen
'95 M3
'97 Z3 2.8


In a message dated 1/13/03 9:56:00 PM, "carl sewell" writes:

>Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:29:48 -0500
>
>From: "carl sewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Subject: [uuc] Insurance, again
>
>All the recent comments re insurance prompted me to request a specimen
>policy from my carrier, Travelers, since the annual billing/statement does
>not include the “fine print.”
>
>Travelers (in Virginia) says they will provide neither liability, collision,
>nor comprehensive coverage for:
>   Any vehicle located inside a facility designed for racing for the purpose
>of:
>a. Competing in; or
>b. Practicing or preparing for;
>Any prearranged or organized racing or speed contest.
>
>Obviously many driving school participants have no intention of ever racing,
>and I wonder how the group sees “prearranged or organized…” If you never
>race, are you covered? If you ever race, have you no coverage for driving
>schools? Any comments welcomed.
>
>
>
>Carl Sewell
>
>Charlottesville VA
>
>e36 M3/4
>
>CCA 151298

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:44:06 -0800 (PST)
From: John Pease <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] radar detector mounting brackets

With all of this talk about radar detectors, I wanted to find out what everyone 
thought about the
mounting brackets you use.

Most including the suction cups don't seem to me to work very well. Either they don't 
hold the
detector for a long time without letting go or they don't allow you to align the 
detector to see
out the front and rear windows very well.

I have some ideas for an excellent mounting scheme to address these problems. The bad 
news is that
it would cost much more than the cheepo suction cups and plastic brackets you can buy. 
In fact, it
would probably sell for $50-100.

Please let me know what you think.

Thank you

John Pease (not quite ready to quit my day job)

 

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

------------------------------

End of [uucdigest] V3 #6015
***************************

________________________________________
| Please visit these UUC-approved BMW parts vendors/service providers:
|          (listed alphabetically)
|
| Autoscope-Motorsports - http://www.autoscope-motorsports.com
| Camptown Automotive - http://www.camptownauto.com
| Circle Tire Co. (used & classic BMW parts) e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|====================================================
|
| Koala MotorSport . BMW technical information, special tool sales/rental
|      http://www.koalamotorsport.com
|
|====================================================
|
| Taylor BMW - http://www.taylorbmw.com - Doc Bimmer!
| UUC Motorwerks . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
|__________________________________________

Reply via email to