Hi, :-) On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 00:52, Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > yup. But after Michael's points, I also think we might clarify and > simplify all this a great deal. In a nutshell > > 1) the ESC does not get to vote, it's not elected, and it's a technical > body. The AB can propose candidate(s), but cannot vote. > 2) BoD appoints the CH, by vote or by consensus. People can nominate > themselves and send their nomination to the BoD no later than 2 months > before the election date. The AB can also nominate one or several > candidates and sends the name(s) to the BoD no later than 2 months > before the election. > > That way, it's easier and faster. Any thoughts? > > Best, > Charles.
Yes, I get the idea. If it's alright with you guys, I'll figure out how to draft that in, and will give a heads-up when I've done so (over the next 24 hours, because I'm slave to a client for the coming hours). Is that OK? Also, I have an idea about a couple of legal experts I could contact and, if they're willing, invite them to jump in on this thread and maybe help arrive at some really bullet-proof bye-laws... should I do that? David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
