Hi Charles, guys :-) I've read all your responses. Thanks for having taken time to give me an answer. ;-)
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 00:28, Charles-H. Schulz <charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > I'm not really comfortable with this extraordinary powers over that > period and I would rather favour you driving a team (-an official team > that is-) . However, this is the Steering Discuss list, which means > that you have written an official and public request to the SC and we > are bound to discuss it at the next SC call, which we will do. OK, thank you. if that will be OK with you guys, I'd like to take not more than 60 seconds to present my thinking to you. If you decide to take a vote on it, then I will happily accept whatever decision you take. In any case, the most important thing would be to take *some* kind of decision that ensures some form of proper future development of the website. Personally, I'm wondering if this is not going to end up as some kind of committee of committees, with endless discussions, little opportunity to take action, etc. Or should one give everyone publishers rights and the first one to log in gets to deface the site to his/her taste? ;-) Two ridiculous extremes, but they could easily happen unless you do something to prevent it... In any case, I have been feeling rather strongly for a few weeks that some affirmative action is needed in community governance. IMHO, the situation with the website is closely linked to an unsatisfactory situation regarding governance. I will start another thread on this subject. I will be listening with interest to the next SC confcall. ;-) David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
