On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 12:47 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > The logos that bear the exact mention of > the software name with the mention "The Document Foundation" are > reserved for two purposes: > > * the sole and official use of TDF as an entity, for instance on splash > screens from software builds compiled by the Document Foundation or on > official materials from the legal entity itself
hmm... a) "Only the logos that bear the exact mention of the software name with the mention “The Document Foundation” are reserved for the sole and official use of TDF as an entity, for instance on splash screens from software builds compiled by the Document Foundation" b) "You may use the Marks without prior written permission (subject to the following terms): 1. To refer to the LibreOffice software in substantially unmodified form. "Substantially unmodified" means built from the source code provided by TDF, possibly with minor modifications including but not limited to: the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, translations into other languages, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, the inclusion of bug-fix patches, or the bundling of additional fonts, templates, artwork and extensions)." So does a packager of LibreOffice, like Red Hat, SuSe, Debian, Ubuntu, etc and so forth who compiles it themselves for their distro, have to change the splashscreen away from the default one which has "The Document Foundation" in it. i.e. a or b ? C. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
