Hi :)
I can live with that.  

I would prefer it if "theming" was replaced with "Branding" and "risk" with 
"risks".  Also the line
"but it feels that the legal risk involved is no greater than other theoretical 
risk free software projects face." 

replaced with 
"but it feels that the legal risk involved is low and easily avoided by using 
screen-shots from Gnu&Linux where possible."

However, i think Florian's new version is plenty good enough.
Regards from
Tom :)




________________________________
From: Florian Effenberger <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 10 August, 2011 9:21:01
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] decision on screenshots

Hi Simon,

Simon Phipps wrote on 2011-08-07 14:44:
> This is too strong. The fact is, every action any project takes is subject to 
>legal risk. Name one that isn't. All that's happened here is that (for 
>whatever 
>motive) the theoretical risk has been articulated for (a part of) this case. 
>I'd 
>suggest saying:
> 
> "The Steering Committee feels that the legal risk involved in using 
> screenshots 
>of non-free desktops in documentation is no greater than any other theoretical 
>risk facing software projects."

not totally. IIRC, Microsoft claimed that taking screenshots will breach the 
EULA. So, to me, although it is a lot of FUD, it is a bit different to any 
"normal" (unclaimed) risks in daily open source work.

To bring this topic to an end, I tried to incorporate all changes into the 
following statement - thoughts welcome:

==
Screenshots for documentation, website and marketing should preferably be taken 
on GNU/Linux, but may also be taken on any other operating system.

The Steering Committee acknowledges that there is a small legal risk involved 
for screenshots on non-free operating systems, but it feels that the legal risk 
involved is no greater than other theoretical risk free software projects face.

The Steering Committee recommends a consistent visual appearance (e.g. theming) 
for the screenshots taken on the selected operating system. It is up to the 
LibreOffice community how to achieve that consistency.
==

Can we all live with that?

Florian

-- Florian Effenberger <[email protected]>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
[email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to