Hi *, Michael Weghorn wrote: > > > Regarding interoperability with MSO (p. 6), I don't have the > > > impression that this is in general a neglected topic that would > > > necessarily need special attention from TDF side at this point (in > > > addition to what's already happening e.g. via tenders). > > > > The link that you provided for the metabug seems to show that there are > > a couple of bugs or three that need some attention. > > Certainly! There is certainly enough work to engage a multitude of > developers in this area (and others). My thought was that - other than other > topics mentioned - it generally seems to be less of a "niche" area in which > there is generally little interest from others at the moment. > Indeed. The other areas both have a lot of bugs, and almost no fixing activity. For interop, there's a lot of bug filing (i.e. community/user interest), but also a lot of bug fixing going on. The query from Michael currently shows 1973 open, vs. 3055 fixed.
So I agree that beyond the ESC-ranked focus projects, it appears no intervention from TDF is currently necessary there. Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
