Hi Sophie, sophi wrote: > Would that mean that each time a l10n team resign for whatever reason (UK > currently in my mind and heart), it will be atticized and need at least 3 > contributors who use something else than Weblate to demonstrate their > contributions to be accepted again in the LO community? > Can't speak for the board, but at least my own idea of the attic proposal was - it is entirely focused on code.
The l10n project always had their own rules when to include or retire a language (percentage of strings translated), and refined that over the years. My take would be, to let the project continue to self-govern there. [beyond that, the attic process has a git repo as the smallest artifact to turn read-only. So technically, we can't simply atticize a language, which are subdirectories in the helpcontent2 and translation git repositories] Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
