Are you offering to train the rest of us how to blog appropriately? -- Dick
On 23-Oct-08, at 10:36 AM, David Recordon wrote: > Yes, I don't disagree with posting on the OpenID blog, just am > disappointed that the time wasn't taken to write a blog post that > would have the appeal of the blog's readership. > > --- > Sent from my iPhone Classic. > > On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:28 AM, "Martin Atkins" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mike Jones wrote: >>> The relevant language in the IPR Procedures document is: >>> · Prominent posting (at least 14 days in advance of the be >>> ginning of the voting period) on homepage of OIDF website (but sol >>> ely for votes to approve Implementers’ Drafts, Final Specification >>> s, and Errata) >>> No, upon re-reading, it doesn’t literally say that notification of >>> the review period must also occur via the home page, but given th >>> at the “prominent posting” of the vote is required to be on the >>> home page, it’s also reasonable to interpret the intent of the pro >>> cedures to assume that the review period notification should be ju >>> st as prominent as the voting notification, which follows it. >> >> Note also that it mentions the "*OIDF* website", not the OpenID >> website. I'm not sure what constitutes the OIDF website, though. Is >> it openid.net/foundation ? >> >> With that said, I don't think there's really much harm in this going >> on openid.net where it will have more visibility to those who might >> like to join OIDF in order to take part in this review / vote. >> > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
