Yes, this is something that I'm hoping Don will be able to drive to
completion over the next few months. We have the needed skeleton of a
plan, but need the time to get the work done.
--David
On Mar 9, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Chris Messina wrote:
Agreed.
This is something that we must address, and has been on our radar.
We largely need to develop a reasonable trademark policy, similar to
Jabber's perhaps, the affords productive and non-misleading uses of
the mark without imperiling the integrity of things are OFFICIALLY
sanctioned or sponsored by the OIDF.
Thanks for raising this issue again.
If you could provide us with specific examples off-list where you're
seeing confusing portrayals of the relationship between OpenID or
OIDF and third-parties, that would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Chris
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Atkins <[email protected]
> wrote:
In a bunch of places I see people thinking that openid.org is
somehow the "main", "default", "primary" or only OpenID provider.
Clearly this is what the OpenID trademark is supposed to protect the
OpenID brand against.
What can be done about this?
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate-at-Large
factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org
citizenagency.com # vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
