David Recordon wrote:
Hey Brett,
There is a 14-day discussion period once the Specs Council has approved
the WG which occurs on the [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
mailing list. There was also a discussion on the same list leading up
to the Specs Council vote on the proposal.
I think everyone agrees that there are other user
interface improvements to be made, though pop-ups are a good starting
point. I think we should address this once the working group is created
and see if there is consensus there to rename the specification being
produced.
Once again I find myself wondering why there is a vote to create a
working group. This is especially perplexing in this case where you seem
to be suggesting that after the group is formed it might decide to
change its scope.
Why can't we just let working groups be created and do their work and
then do the vote on the finished specification itself rather than on the
plan to create one?
All the current setup seems to achieve is that folks do most of the work
in other forums like the "step2" mailing list where the OpenID community
can't necessarily see it, and then they just go through the motions to
create the working group after most of the work has already been done.
This seems counter-productive.
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
