Rank is rather hopeless as a metric. I dedicate 1% of computing power to
some projects and I am in the top few. On others I dedicate 33% of
computing power and I am not in the top thousand.
jm7
zombie67
<[email protected]
> To
Sent by: BOINC Dev Mailing List
boinc_dev-bounces <[email protected]>
@ssl.berkeley.edu cc
Subject
07/22/2009 01:43 Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_projects]
AM Catastrophe is looming; desperately
need advice
Please respond to
BOINC Dev Mailing
List
<[email protected]
rkeley.edu>
On Jul 21, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Lynn W. Taylor wrote:
> I don't see a way out, short of doing exactly what Eric Korpela's
> script
> tries to do -- normalize FLOPS credit to that predicted by the
> (imperfect) benchmarks.
Solution: Give up on cross-project credit parity. It's an impossible
goal. QCN anyone? If cross-project comparison is needed, do it via
rank. As long as the credits within each project are stable, that
works fine.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
