El Lunes 17 Ago 2009 20:56:27 Eric J Korpela escribió: > 2) Is IMKL or ACML covered by the GPL v2 clause "However, as a > special exception, the source code distributed need not include > anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary > form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the > operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component > itself accompanies the executable." or the GPL v3 clause I posted > earlier (if the license is "v2 or later")? > > If the Intel compiler is required in order to use IMKL and an AMD > compiler is required to use ACML, you could probably make the claim > that it is allowed, especially if those libraries are included by > default in any builds with that compiler. If you can link to these > libraries using a stock GCC or Visual-C++ compiler, then that claim > gets more difficult to make.
For this point, I think you should ask <licensing at fsf dot org>. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
