Paul D. Buck wrote: > The saddest thing about this whole discussion is that I seem to be the > only one in the world that wants to improve the rigor with which we do > the science we as a collective claim to be so concerned about... > > I will say it again, it is not about getting results ... it is about > getting correct results ... and we should be willing to pay the costs to > get correct results.
You pointed out earlier that what McAfee does lies outside the BOINC framework. So does the actual science. It is up to each project to provide their own science application, and to determine how they can best validate the results. BOINC can only provide tools, they can't (and shouldn't) make their use compulsory. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
