El Martes 29 Sep 2009 10:29:51 john.mcl...@sybase.com escribió: > Was that the internal bookkeeping that was taking the entire CPU core? Or > was it the UI taking the entire core? I do remember a discussion that > indicated that in those cases the UI would bog down. The default algorithm > for sorting tasks in the UI is unfortunately (n^2)*lg(n) in complexity, and > having a few thousand tasks tends to absorb an incredible amount of time > there. There is a simple method (implemented now?) that changes that to > n*lg(n) in complexity.
It was probably the UI, but it affects the core client as well. The client handling GUI RPCs once per second and serializing a thousand tasks into XML takes a lot of CPU too; not as much as the manager parsing that and loading the GUI list, but still a lot. -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
