My opinion is not really.
jm7
David Anderson
<[email protected]
ey.edu> To
Sent by: Richard Haselgrove
<boinc_dev-bounce <[email protected]>
[email protected] cc
u> BOINC Dev Mailing List
<[email protected]>, BOINC
Alpha list
07/30/2010 07:57 <[email protected]>
PM Subject
Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Why
not keep it simple?
OK, maybe I should have asked:
Do "Add" and "Remove" provide sufficient additional clarity
to justify a change in terminology?
-- David
On 30-Jul-2010 4:50 PM, Richard Haselgrove wrote:
> Only that it's yet another change which may ripple through to unexpected
> places, and require re-writes of both internal and external
documentation.
>
> And as always, the transition can cause confusion, while some users have
> older clients and others have newer.
>
> Provided the transition, and the changes, are managed properly, I have
> no objection.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
