Since the change from attach to add has already been made, we will now need
to figure out what to do with the "Client detached" message as it no longer
makes any sense at all.
jm7
David Anderson
<[email protected]
ey.edu> To
Sent by: Richard Haselgrove
<boinc_dev-bounce <[email protected]>
[email protected] cc
u> BOINC Dev Mailing List
<[email protected]>, BOINC
Alpha list
07/30/2010 07:57 <[email protected]>
PM Subject
Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Why
not keep it simple?
OK, maybe I should have asked:
Do "Add" and "Remove" provide sufficient additional clarity
to justify a change in terminology?
-- David
On 30-Jul-2010 4:50 PM, Richard Haselgrove wrote:
> Only that it's yet another change which may ripple through to unexpected
> places, and require re-writes of both internal and external
documentation.
>
> And as always, the transition can cause confusion, while some users have
> older clients and others have newer.
>
> Provided the transition, and the changes, are managed properly, I have
> no objection.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
