And what about anonymous platform? How can I define that one GPU requires one type of app and another GPU requires another app type? Project can have no GPU apps at all in general, but there can be third-party GPU apps...
----- Original Message ----- From: David Anderson To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:07 AM Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] Plan classes for AMD GPUs The plan class mechanism lets projects define their own plan classes, and they can use these to target app versions to specific GPU characteristics if they like. They don't need BOINC to define these plan classes for them. -- David On 11-Dec-2010 2:50 PM, Raistmer wrote: >> From Lunatics beta thread: > " Quote from: cenit on Today at 00:35:57 Put for example that I have a HD > 4870 and a HD 5870 in the same host, with a unified app it would be easy to > get full performances (with both app, I would have to use the non-HD5 for > both!) > > Devices with different capabilities should have different plan classes first > of all. And if there are different plan classes I see no problem to use few > different app each fine tuned for particular device. > > " > > Could we expect such different plan classes for OpenCL apps for ATi HD4xxx > and HD5xxx that drastically differ in capabilities (no scratchpad local > memory on HD4xxx at all) ? _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, > visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
