I'm still wondering who is responsible for establishing the mapping between logical and physical device numbering, when the hardware and software enumerators return different answers.
> On 14-Mar-2011 2:37 AM, Richard Haselgrove wrote: >> >> The issue is not really one of plan_classes, but of whether the construct >> >> <coproc> >> <type>OpenCL</type> >> </coproc> >> >> is recognised by the client: no, it isn't, according to coproc_detect.cpp > > Nor should it be; OpenCL is a language system, not a GPU type. > > -- David > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
