My inclination (since ARM processors are diverse and fast-changing) is to have the platform names be catch-all (e.g. arm-linux-gnu) and handle the processor details in app plan functions. -- David
On 08-Aug-2012 11:23 PM, Christian Beer wrote: > Hi all, > > I still think this should somehow be solved in the future. At > Rechenkraft.net we think about creating a sensor station using > ARM-boards with some kind of plug-in capability. For example you connect > a motion sensor to detect earthquackes, a radiation-detector for > radioactive@home and a weather sensor for some other project. This is > still in idea stage but worth a thought as we think. > > Regards > Christian > > Am 09.08.2012 00:35, schrieb Carl Christensen: >> yeah I think I'll just make my own localized armv6-raspi name for our >> servers as it's not ready to settle on a "public" boinc platform name yet. >> It seems like I will have more versions of ARMs with the various "plug >> computers" I'm testing out too. >> _______________________________________________ >> boinc_dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
