The attempt is to count time * speed -----Original Message----- From: boinc_dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Stilte Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 1:08 PM To: David Anderson Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED (sorry, yes me again, but please read)
Considering that we do not count flops but time... Retreating to semantics? And I've got a few cents to add on using RAC but I've run out of time to share that particular balloon popper. 2014-06-12 18:45 GMT+02:00 David Anderson <[email protected]>: > To reiterate (from discussions several years ago): > > - Resource shares apply to a host's total FLOPS, not time on particular > devices. > This is the appropriate semantics. > > - We chose not to use RAC as a basis for scheduling because > a) there can be long and unpredictable delays in granting credit, > because of replication > b) jobs may not be granted credit for a variety of reasons, > in which case the client would (undesirably) > keep running jobs for that project. > > -- D > > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
