On Monday, 15 August 2016, 19:55, "McLeod, John" <[email protected]> wrote:
A few notes. ...3) How do we handle failed / late / invalid tasks? Ones that have used resources, but are not going to generate credit? Projects with a large % of failed / late / invalid tasks on this compute? Ideally, by having a far more robust than current quota restriction system. There's no point in permitting continued 'participation' in a scientific research project by a host which is no longer contributing valid science (if it ever did) - and whose owner shows no willingness to engage with the project administrators or the rest of the volunteer community. We all know who they are and where they can be found. Projects where the scientific administrators show no willingness to engage with the rest of the volunteer community are a different kettle of fish entirely. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
