My thoughts:
1) The basic ideas behind the current credit system are sound,
but there seem to be some problems with the details,
in particular what happens when new app versions are added.
2) We need a simulator that models credit calculations for various scenarios
(synthetic, or based on trace data from a project).
Such a simulator would help identify the problems with the current system,
or would demonstrate that a new scheme works better.
I don't think we should consider a new system without simulator-based
validation of it.
-- David
On 8/14/2016 9:06 AM, CM wrote:
Hey,
A '4th gen BOINC credit system' thread was created over at the official BOINC
forums: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10953
There's been about 77 posts to the thread, the general consensus was that a new
BOINC credit system is a good idea but thus far the definition/specs of such a
next gen system has not been agreed upon.
What are the BOINC dev's thoughts on this topic? I'd love to continue this
discussion & work towards a next-gen BOINC system.
Cheers guys :)
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
