Jason Groothuis wrote: > Are you going to check with all the anonymous platform developers ? Or just > pull down their statues ? > > ________________________________ > From: boinc_dev <boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu> on behalf of David > Anderson <da...@ssl.berkeley.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, 22 August 2017 12:58 > To: Darrell Holz; boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu; Boinc Projects > Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] AMD's CAL > > If no projects have CAL apps, I don't see any reason to keep the CAL > device enumeration code. Anyone else? Moo! Wrapper Project still has CAL apps, even couple different versions due to BOINC Library incompatibilies caused by older BOINC versions missing some information in the related XML-files. We prefer to keep Dnet Apps running on old legacy cards where OpenCL is not an option (or is not as performant as CAL) as well so I don't see us removing CAL support anytime soon. -- Teemu Mannermaa System Specialist
"Anything is possible but probabilities vary." _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu https://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
