> I think using info-mining is just as fast or faster than a > database--and easier to use, but it is a very specific, single-focus > solution.
I don't know exactly what you mean by info mining, but anything using regular expressions will be slower than a database solution. On Oct 15, 1:11 pm, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote: > I think using info-mining is just as fast or faster than a > database--and easier to use, but it is a very specific, single-focus > solution. If you are going to be treating multiple data values on lots > of files and retrieving/reporting that data in multiple ways, > maintaining multiple info lists would be onerous. On the other hand if > you just need this one functionality, I'd definitely go with a single, > simple flat file. Your speed will be plenty impressive. > > As for synching--if you use the info file solution, you probably have > no need for the local data variable. Just use the info value fully, > once you have it mined. > > Cheers, > Dan > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thank you both for your rapid input. > > > I will check the info solution first but I definitely have an eye on > > your mysql plugin, DrunkenMonk. I am happy that we have the choice now > > - flat file or database. > > > Thanks a lot. > > Greetings, Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
