Hi,
1) Inline display of $$actions is broken. The CSS is:
.actions ul li {
display:inline;
}
HTML contains <br />'s:
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="top">
<div id="top0"><p><div class='actions' ><br /><br />
<ul><li><a href="...&action=view" >view</a> <br /></li><li><a
... some actions ...
href="...&action=print" >print</a> </div></li></ul></p></div>
2) One of my templates is broken.
Template code:
[(template first)][t]
[(template each)][r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]>>[(lastmodified
page={+p} fmt="%d.%m.%Y – %H:%M")]>>[c style="width:400px;padding:0;"]
[(breadcrumb {+p} offset=1 name=link)]
[(template last)][t]
[[#end]]
On site:
[t]
[r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]08.03.2010 – 22:21[c style="width:
400px;padding:0;"]...
[r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]08.03.2010 – 22:20[c style="width:
400px;padding:0;"]...
[r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]08.03.2010 – 22:20[c style="width:
400px;padding:0;"]...
[t]
HTML:
<p>[t]<br />
</p><p>[r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]<font style='font-size:
90%'>08.03.2010 – 22:23</font>[c style="width:400px;padding:0;"]<a
href="..." >...</a><br />
</p><p>[r][c style="width:150px;padding:0;"]<font style='font-size:
90%'>08.03.2010 – 22:23</font>[c style="width:400px;padding:0;"]<"..."
>...</a><br />
...
</p><p>[t]<br />
<a name='end'></a></p>
Hope this helps and thanks a lot for these exciting releases! :)
Markus
On Mar 9, 11:43 am, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just re-released 3.3.9 as 3.4, to give us an up-to-date stable
> release. It probably should have set awhile longer to ferret out bug
> reports, but I was eager to get on to the 3.4 round, and thus
> eventually to 4.xx. No need to upgrade if you are already on 3.3.9,
> but I will be maintaining 3.4 for a bit, at least until 3.5 is out, so
> the two may diverge eventually. And then 3.5 should be the end of the
> 3.xx series, and we get to start exploring some bigger stuff for 4.xx.
>
> I also released 3.4.1, a more experimental release with the new
> linespacing code I've been working on. To do this right is an
> extremely challenging task, but I think we are pretty close.
> Basically, BoltWire now waits until all the markup has been executed,
> then breaks the output down, line by line tries to analyze each one,
> and figure out what kind of html it should be wrapped in. And that's
> the trick--BoltWire has to play mind reader... But hey, take a look at
> the output for yourself.
>
> http://www.boltwire.com/files/boltwire3.4.1.zip
>
> I'd recommend trying this one on an experimental site. I've done a
> fair bit of testing, but keep finding little oddities here and there.
> It's looking quite good at the moment, but I'm soliciting testing help
> to find anything that is less than ideal html. And bugs/glitches of
> course. There's still a few issues in my inbox, but I wanted to get
> this out first. I'll try and examine the other stuff when I get some
> time, and work them into 3.4.2, along with any improvements you can
> suggest for the new code.
>
> From the change log:
>
> * A major overhaul of the linespacing problem to generate MUCH smarter
> (and more beautiful) html output. Should be a fairly easy upgrade, but
> some sites may experience minor disruptions--particularly if you have
> various display hacks in your markup.
> * Table nesting is now done similarly to our conditionals, with
> [t*][r][c][t*], meaning only one level of nesting can be done.
> * Renamed the honorlines site.config parameter to autolines.
>
> Note: This release involves many minor changes to the code, including
> significant changes to the markup table, a couple new functions
> (vspace, vspacecheck), and a renamed function (stripquotes =>
> trimChars), plus probably more things I can't recall. Consider this
> release highly experimental, and plan to take some time to review your
> site carefully after upgrading for minor formatting changes changes.
> Thanks for helping polishing this release up. You gotta see the new
> html... Good stuff!
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> P.S. I have a couple minor things I plan to do with BoltWire's
> searching engine to increase performance and add flexibility, using
> some custom code I have running on my site. That's about it on my list
> for 3.5. The restructuring of the forms engine won't be a terribly
> challenging task, but I plan to make that a part of 4.xx.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BoltWire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
