I have come up with a solution that might be trivial but I am not
seeing any problems except the ones mentioned below. If you do, please
tell me.
1. For every tag of a page I write this:
Search for more pages about:
[[tagsearch&tagquery=TheTag|TheTag]]
2. I created a page that accepts "tagquery":
Results for {?tagquery}:
[(search text='{?tagquery}' group=some.* fmt=title)]
[results]
+ I don't have to input data
+ tags are part of the page and therefore accessible to search engines
+ tags are hijacked for search
+ allows the use of /*invisible tags*/
- cannot automatically create a list of all tags, do you see a way to
do this?
- "[[tagsearch&tagquery=TheTag|TheTag]]" is redundant, better would be
to input something like "[(taglist tags="SomeTag 'tag with
space'")]" (is there a built-in way to achieve this?)
Markus
On Mar 11, 9:48 pm, riccardo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:36:34PM -0500, The Editor wrote:
>
> > Going back to the original goal, tags might indeed be your best
> > solution. But for BoltWire's internal engine, we might be able to
> > tweak the code to make certain data fields indexable. Currently the
>
> Just a thought: it could be pretty simple to write a plugin that would put
> the keywords (from the metatags) into a box displayed on the page (to be
> placed and formatted in css of course). This might make them visible to
> google, and on many sites would not be illogical for the user (given a good
> choice of keywords).
>
> Richard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BoltWire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.