No, it's not exactly what I meant... Just go to your website and search for "data"... There is no result! This is not what one would expect, and this is surely not how it worked one month back or earlier. I don't know what happened, and I hoped that the new indexing rules would fix this as a bonus, but it doesn't seem to be the case... Cheers, Tiffany
Le lundi 3 novembre 2014 20:51:43 UTC+1, Dan a écrit : > > Not trying to compete with Google. But sometimes you have protected pages > Google can't access/index, or you want to create a custom search index for > some special purpose. You also have full control over the display and no > ads! :) > > Cheers, > Dan > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Tiffany Grenier <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I don't mind rewriting the index rules, but you should maybe put a notice >> about that on the admin home page. >> By the way, if this can help a better indexing of your website, where it >> is becoming more efficient to search via Google than your search page, I'm >> definitely for 100% for it ;-) >> Cheers, >> Tiffany >> >> Le mercredi 29 octobre 2014 00:31:22 UTC+1, Dan a écrit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Just thinking out loud on this one... But I have one very large site >>> with page many thousands of pages--and indexing is a real performance >>> challenge. >>> >>> Currently when you set an index rule, it uses syntax similar to the >>> search function. So for example: >>> >>> forum: mode=text group=forum.* type=number ... >>> >>> Basically, when a page gets modified, the auto index function looks at >>> this rule and generates a master list of all the possible page matches, >>> then checks if the modified page is in the list. With multiple rules and >>> thousands of pages this can take several seconds. Unacceptable. >>> >>> I'm considering an alternate syntax like the following: >>> >>> forum: if='equal {+p1} forum && number {+p3}' mode=text >>> >>> It would simply run the one page through the conditional test and it >>> either passes or fail. If it passes, the page gets indexed. >>> >>> To me it's not that much different and still pretty familiar syntax. But >>> it would require you to update your index rules. Any feedback before making >>> the change? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BoltWire" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
