Oops! Forgot to update the index rules for my own site. I think it is working now... Admittedly, could use some help with the tagging feature...
Cheers, Dan On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tiffany Grenier <[email protected]> wrote: > No, it's not exactly what I meant... Just go to your website and search > for "data"... There is no result! This is not what one would expect, and > this is surely not how it worked one month back or earlier. I don't know > what happened, and I hoped that the new indexing rules would fix this as a > bonus, but it doesn't seem to be the case... > Cheers, > Tiffany > > Le lundi 3 novembre 2014 20:51:43 UTC+1, Dan a écrit : >> >> Not trying to compete with Google. But sometimes you have protected pages >> Google can't access/index, or you want to create a custom search index for >> some special purpose. You also have full control over the display and no >> ads! :) >> >> Cheers, >> Dan >> >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Tiffany Grenier <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't mind rewriting the index rules, but you should maybe put a >>> notice about that on the admin home page. >>> By the way, if this can help a better indexing of your website, where it >>> is becoming more efficient to search via Google than your search page, I'm >>> definitely for 100% for it ;-) >>> Cheers, >>> Tiffany >>> >>> Le mercredi 29 octobre 2014 00:31:22 UTC+1, Dan a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Just thinking out loud on this one... But I have one very large site >>>> with page many thousands of pages--and indexing is a real performance >>>> challenge. >>>> >>>> Currently when you set an index rule, it uses syntax similar to the >>>> search function. So for example: >>>> >>>> forum: mode=text group=forum.* type=number ... >>>> >>>> Basically, when a page gets modified, the auto index function looks at >>>> this rule and generates a master list of all the possible page matches, >>>> then checks if the modified page is in the list. With multiple rules and >>>> thousands of pages this can take several seconds. Unacceptable. >>>> >>>> I'm considering an alternate syntax like the following: >>>> >>>> forum: if='equal {+p1} forum && number {+p3}' mode=text >>>> >>>> It would simply run the one page through the conditional test and it >>>> either passes or fail. If it passes, the page gets indexed. >>>> >>>> To me it's not that much different and still pretty familiar syntax. >>>> But it would require you to update your index rules. Any feedback before >>>> making the change? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "BoltWire" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BoltWire" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
