oh that's true. you had mentioned this before. i agree. so what do you think the version of the first release should be?
ben On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, but I think the versioning scheme shouldn't go backwards. There's > already a version 3.3.2 in the wild, so going backwards in the versioning > scheme will just be confusing. > > -Ivan > > On 19/05/2011 17:01, Benjamin Reed wrote: >> >> i think we should push to get a bookkeeper release out. i think the >> main thing we need is to put together some doc. should we call it 0.1? >> target mid june? >> >> ben > >
