I don't see any reason not to keep on the current trajectory, so 3.4.0
for the first release.
-Ivan
On 20/05/2011 17:35, Benjamin Reed wrote:
oh that's true. you had mentioned this before. i agree. so what do you
think the version of the first release should be?
ben
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Ivan Kelly<[email protected]> wrote:
+1, but I think the versioning scheme shouldn't go backwards. There's
already a version 3.3.2 in the wild, so going backwards in the versioning
scheme will just be confusing.
-Ivan
On 19/05/2011 17:01, Benjamin Reed wrote:
i think we should push to get a bookkeeper release out. i think the
main thing we need is to put together some doc. should we call it 0.1?
target mid june?
ben
