[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13197716#comment-13197716
 ] 

Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-157:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
Just so that I make sure I understand, the discussion about netty is to justify 
the solution of the patch, right?
{quote}
Yes, it's purely informational.

{quote}
This patch seems to enables us to increase the number of threads, but it 
doesn't actually increase it or allow an application to increase it through 
configuration. Is this intentional?
{quote}
I didn't touch the number of threads which are actually created, I just removed 
the bottleneck which occurs when writing to a single ledger, that only one of 
the worker threads is used.

I'll add a comment to the synchronisation now.
                
> For small packets, increasing number of bookies actually degrades performance.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-157
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.1.0
>
>         Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-157.diff, run1.pdf, varySize.pdf
>
>
> When benchmarking with packets smaller than 1k, performance will degrade when 
> the ensemble contains more than 3 bookies. See attached diagram.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to