[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13219002#comment-13219002
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-176:
---------------------------------------
Re: 1.
It's not clean, but its difficult to do cleanly because ZooKeeper expects a
watcher for its construction, BookKeeper expects a ZooKeeper for its
construction, and the Watcher for ZK requires a the CountDownLatch created by
BookKeeper, which cannot be used until after the base constructor is run. Still
I don't like nulls, let me try something else.
Re: 2.
We should open another JIRA for that TODO.
> HierarchicalBookieFailureTest Hung
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-176
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-176
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Flavio Junqueira
> Assignee: Ivan Kelly
> Fix For: 4.1.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-176.diff,
> HierarchicalBookieFailureTest.jstack.out
>
>
> See jstack attachment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
