-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4481/#review6511
-----------------------------------------------------------



bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/FlatLedgerManager.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4481/#comment14165>

    Casting indicates that something is wrong in your abstraction. Perhaps 
activeLedgers.snapshot() should return a SortedMap, and doGC() should take a 
Map. It doesn't do anything that requires the ConcurrentMap interface.



bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/HierarchicalLedgerManager.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4481/#comment14166>

    why not just have the implementation of SnapshotMap use a 
ConcurrentSkipListMap?


- Ivan


On 2012-03-29 05:27:14, Sijie Guo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4481/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-29 05:27:14)
> 
> 
> Review request for bookkeeper.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> create a snapshot of bookie active ledgers, and then fetch the list of 
> zookeeper metadata, then it is safe to do garbage collection.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug BOOKKEEPER-193.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-193
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/SnapshotMap.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/FlatLedgerManager.java
>  100cdad 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/HierarchicalLedgerManager.java
>  169c906 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/GcLedgersTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/LedgerManagerTestCase.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4481/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sijie
> 
>

Reply via email to