[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13418344#comment-13418344
]
Flavio Junqueira edited comment on BOOKKEEPER-310 at 7/19/12 3:38 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I checked the latest patch and it doesn't seem to compile without the patches
for BOOKKEEPER-309 and BOOKKEEPER-311. Is it right? The patch looks good to me,
but I'd like to make sure it is not breaking anything.
was (Author: fpj):
I checked the latest patch and it doesn't seem to compile without the
patches for BOOKKEEPER-309 and BOOKKEEPER-311. Is it right? The patch looks
good to me, but I'd like to make sure it is breaking anything.
> Changes in hedwig server to support JMS spec
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-310
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Mridul Muralidharan
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-310.diff, hedwig-server.patch,
> hedwig-server.patch.1, hedwig-server.patch.3, hedwig-server.patch.4
>
>
> The primary changes are :
> a) Support modified protocol changes (optional body).
> b) Return the published message's seq-id in the response.
> c) Minor bugfix to Array indexing in bucket which was triggered in a testcase.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
