[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13685548#comment-13685548
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-620:
---------------------------------------
Putting them in lockstep would mean they're not interleaved. There's enough
iterations to ensure they overlap. Also, I don't start running the connects
until the disconnect thread has started.
> PerChannelBookieClient race during channel disconnect
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-620
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-client
> Reporter: Sijie Guo
> Assignee: Robin Dhamankar
> Fix For: 4.2.2, 4.3.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-BOOKKEEPER-620-PerChannelBookieClient-race-during-ch.patch,
> 0001-BOOKKEEPER-620-PerChannelBookieClient-race-during-ch.patch,
> 0002-BOOKKEEPER-620-PerChannelBookieClient-race-during-ch.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-620.diff
>
>
> channel & state are not synchronized in PerChannelBookieClient#closeInternal.
> so it might cause state is set to CONNECTED but the netty channel is closed
> by mistake in closeInternal.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
