[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697671#comment-13697671
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-629:
---------------------------------------
Actually what we could do is register the bookie as
/ledgers/active/<uuid>-<host/ip>-<port>. This removes the extra lookup. The
uuid could then be used in the ledger metadata. uuid and port could be used in
the cookie. The issues Sijie raised about BC is valid. However, fixing for this
should be the same as fixing for hostname. However, in this case, the main
usecase is VM appliances, so BC shouldn't be a huge issue (we should provide
tools to change a existing ip/hostname in any case).
> Support hostname based ledger metadata to help users to change IP with
> exitsting installation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-629
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery, bookkeeper-client,
> bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.3.0
> Reporter: Vinay
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: 1-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 2-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 3-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 4-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 5-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 6-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch
>
>
> Register the bookie with *hostname:port* and also store the bookie addresses
> as *hostname:port* in ledger metadata files instead of *ip:port*
> This will help users to change the machine IP if they want without loosing
> their data.
> Supporting hostname based installation/functionality is one of the important
> requirement of users.
> Any thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
