[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697709#comment-13697709
]
Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-629:
-------------------------------------
bq.register the bookie as /ledgers/active/<uuid>-<host/ip>-<port>. This removes
the extra lookup.The issues Sijie raised about BC is valid. However, fixing for
this should be the same as fixing for hostname
Should we continue with the old ledgermetadata format <host/ip:port> for BC?
Sorry, I didn't completely understood the <uuid> concept without causing any
backward compatibility issues.
> Support hostname based ledger metadata to help users to change IP with
> exitsting installation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-629
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery, bookkeeper-client,
> bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.3.0
> Reporter: Vinay
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: 1-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 2-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 3-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 4-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 5-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 6-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch
>
>
> Register the bookie with *hostname:port* and also store the bookie addresses
> as *hostname:port* in ledger metadata files instead of *ip:port*
> This will help users to change the machine IP if they want without loosing
> their data.
> Supporting hostname based installation/functionality is one of the important
> requirement of users.
> Any thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
