[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959303#comment-13959303
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-629:
---------------------------------------------
I'm sorry for chiming in late, but I was wondering if it wouldn't be best to
recreate the znode instead of inverting the value of the parameter. It may be a
bit counterintuitive.
> Support hostname based ledger metadata to help users to change IP with
> existing installation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-629
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery, bookkeeper-client,
> bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.1
> Reporter: Vinayakumar B
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: 1-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 10-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 11-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 2-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 3-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 4-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 5-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 6-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch,
> 7-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 9-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch
>
>
> Register the bookie with *hostname:port* and also store the bookie addresses
> as *hostname:port* in ledger metadata files instead of *ip:port*
> This will help users to change the machine IP if they want without loosing
> their data.
> Supporting hostname based installation/functionality is one of the important
> requirement of users.
> Any thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
