"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
aveup0$8jc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:aveup0$8jc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [...]
> There are many variants, e.g.:
>
> typedef double yes_type;
> typedef yes_type no_type[2];
Same problem as Terje's example...can't return array types. ;) Vandevoorde
and Josuttis use char and struct { char[2] }. I guess the best choice would
be the one that taxes the compiler least, but I'm not sure how to determine
that (short of asking the compiler vendors).
Dave
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
